<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.mediazulu.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Mediazulu - Media in Love with Obama?  No Way - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.mediazulu.com/node/109</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Media in Love with Obama?  No Way&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Media in Love with Obama?  No Way</title>
 <link>http://www.mediazulu.com/node/109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody who thinks Barack Obama has been getting a free pass from the so-called media, hasn&#039;t been reading The New York Times for months or missed &quot;Saturday Night Live&quot; the last couple of weeks. The Times has let its endorsement of Hilary Clinton slip into its biased coverage of Obama, looking for any grain of a story about him that might tarnish his White House run. Remember the front page story a couple of weeks ago, exploring Obama&#039;s drug use  -- something he has written extensively about in his memoirs -- that had nothing new to say. Meanwhile, if Clinton pulls out a double upset, with big wins in Texas and Ohio tomorrow, no doubt pundits will be pointing to the &quot;Saturday Night Live&quot; factor -- the bit two weeks ago about lampooning fawning press coverage of Obama and her appearance last weekend -- as the beginning of her second coming as the comeback kid.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.mediazulu.com/node/109#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:16:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>J. Max Robins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109 at http://www.mediazulu.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
